The New Bank Of Ghana Corporate Governance Rules Signals a Call to Maturity for Fintech’s by the Regulator(..Is this an Africa Trend ?)

[Want to get automatic updates on ethel cofie’s blog post of Africa, technology, ecosystems and doing business in Africa sign up here ]

Fintech Maturity Requires Board Maturity: What Ghana’s New Governance Rules Signal for the Future of Digital Finance

In June 2025, the Bank of Ghana released its Corporate Governance Guidelines for Payment Service Providers. At first glance, it might seem like just another compliance update—but read between the lines, and you’ll see something deeper.

This is a call to leadership.

These guidelines don’t merely set minimum standards. They signal the central bank’s expectation that Ghana’s digital finance sector is no longer in its experimental phase. It is systemically important. And with that importance comes accountability, transparency, and—most importantly—governance maturity.

Ghana is not alone. Across Africa, fintech is growing up—and regulators are making it clear: scale must now be matched with structure.

What’s Actually New in Ghana

While some provisions formalize best practices already expected of traditional banks, several new rules are now mandatory for fintechs, electronic money issuers, and payment institutions—especially DEMIs (Dedicated Electronic Money Issuers) and EPSPs (Enhanced PSPs). Key highlights include:

Board Composition, Size & Independence

• Every Regulated Institution must have a minimum of three (3) board members.
• At least two directors, including the CEO, must be ordinarily resident in Ghana.
• The board must have a majority of non-executive directors.
• For DEMIs and EPSPs, at least one-third (1/3) of directors must be independent.
• No more than one-third (1/3) of the board may be related persons.
• A clear separation of roles is required: the same individual cannot serve as Board Chair and CEO.
• Cross-directorships and certain relationships with institutional shareholders are regulated or restricted.

Governance Infrastructure

• Institutions must develop and operate under a formal Board Charter, which outlines responsibilities, qualifications, ethics, meeting protocols, and succession plans.
• Boards must submit an Annual Declaration confirming compliance and disclosing any governance weaknesses and remediation plans.
• Formal board evaluations are mandatory, with third-party evaluations every 3 years.

Specialized Committees

• Audit and Risk & Compliance Committees are mandatory for DEMIs and EPSPs, chaired by independent directors.
• The Board Chair is prohibited from chairing any board sub-committee.

Skills, Certification, and Induction

• All directors must complete corporate governance certification every 4 years.
• Newly appointed directors must complete a formal induction programme within 3 months.

Timeline: When Does This Come Into Effect?

Effective Date: 31st December 2025

That gives less than 6 months for regulated institutions to restructure boards, finalize policies, and demonstrate proactive governance transformation to the regulator.

How Should Fintechs in Ghana Prepare?

For founders, boards, and investors in Ghana’s digital finance ecosystem, this isn’t just an operational checklist—it’s a strategic inflection point. Here’s a roadmap:

1. Run a Governance Gap Audit
   Assess your board’s size, composition, committee structure, independence, qualifications, and documentation. Where are the gaps?
2. Map and Fill Required Roles
   Ensure your institution has appointed and trained:
   • Technology & Systems Manager
   • Risk & Compliance Manager
   • AML Reporting Officer
   • Chief Finance Officer
3. Form or Strengthen Committees
   Establish properly chartered Audit and Risk Committees chaired by qualified independent directors.
4. Board Induction and Evaluation
   Implement induction programmes immediately. Schedule formal internal evaluations and prepare for the external review cycle.
5. Designate a Governance Lead
   Appoint someone (internally or externally) to coordinate all governance compliance efforts and communication with the Bank of Ghana.

 

A Continental Shift Toward Fintech Maturity ?

Ghana’s new governance rules reflect a larger trend across the continent: African fintech is entering a phase of institutional consolidation. The first wave was about experimentation and market entry. The next wave—already underway—is about trust, infrastructure, and regulatory credibility.

So where is Africa heading, and who is leading?

1. Nigeria:
   With a large population, active central bank (CBN), and high fintech penetration, Nigeria has moved quickly to introduce licensing frameworks (e.g., switching licenses, sandboxing), consumer protection rules, and now seeks to tighten capital requirements. However, corporate governance rules for fintechs remain uneven, and enforcement has been inconsistent.
2. Kenya:
   Home to M-Pesa, Kenya continues to be a pioneer in mobile money. The Capital Markets Authority (CMA) and Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) are increasingly aligning on regulatory clarity. Recent policies emphasize interoperability, consumer data protection, and cybersecurity standards—but board-level governance requirements remain more implicit than formalized.
3. South Africa:
   South Africa has the continent’s most mature financial regulatory ecosystem. Fintechs are expected to meet the same standards as other financial institutions under the FSCA and SARB. Governance, risk management, and compliance expectations are deeply embedded in licensing processes. However, the barrier to entry is high for early-stage players.
4. Rwanda & Mauritius:
   Though smaller, both countries punch above their weight with innovation-friendly sandboxes and tightly integrated regulatory frameworks. Mauritius, for instance, has well-defined director responsibilities and risk oversight structures even for emerging financial players. Rwanda has moved quickly to harmonize fintech regulation across central bank, innovation agencies, and tax regimes.

 

Why This Matters

The future of fintech in Africa depends not just on innovation—but on institutional readiness.

As fintechs take on quasi-bank roles—holding deposits, offering credit, handling remittances—their systemic risk grows. Regulators are responding accordingly. But beyond compliance, robust governance is fast becoming a competitive advantage:

• Investors are demanding mature boards, risk oversight, and strategic clarity.
• Partnerships (especially with banks and MNOs) hinge on trust and transparency.
• Cross-border growth under AfCFTA will require harmonized governance standards.
• Consumer trust depends on more than just sleek apps—it hinges on safety, continuity, and fairness.

 

Why I’m Paying Attention

As someone who has worked with fintechs, advised boards, and helped shape digital strategy across Africa, I believe we’re at a governance inflection point.

The institutions that will thrive in this new era are not just the most agile—but the most accountable. Fintech boardrooms now need directors who can do more than approve strategy. They must understand risk, tech, regulation, and long-term resilience.

This is also an opportunity. For women in tech leadership, for pan-African operators, and for experienced board advisors—this is the time to step forward. The ecosystem needs directors who are not just regulators of risk, but translators of innovation. People who understand how to challenge, adapt, and guide organizations through complexity without stifling ambition.

If you’re navigating these changes, building a board, or preparing your institution for this next phase, I’m always open to a conversation.

Let’s build the future of African fintech with not just speed—but structure.